Thoughts on Gay Adoption

January 4, 2009

You may notice that I have already broken my first New Year’s resolution, to post every day.  I was on a weekend trip to Tampa with my family and had no internet access.  Bite me.  :-)   To make up for it, you’ll be getting extra posts during the next few days.

First, I would like to talk about this article in the Tampa Tribune.  Two gay men have been foster parents to two girls for several years.  Due to Florida’s ban on adoption by homosexuals, they will be a foster family indefinitely, or until the ban is overturned- which is looking more and more like a real possibility.

I’ll come right out and say that I think the ban violates the equal protection clause and is therefore unconstitutional.  However, I want to draw particular attention to this paragraph:

The pair tried through Watson’s will to ensure the girls remain with Elsass if something happens to Watson. Because the state does not recognize the men as parents, though, there are no guarantees.

And no perks. Like the $417 monthly stipend available to parents who adopt a child in state custody. And the four-year college scholarships given those children.

Watson and Elsass say they can afford to provide everything for their daughters, but what if they couldn’t?

I think even the staunchest advocate for traditional family structure can see that this is wrong.  These children are no less deserving of a future and an education than those whose foster/adoptive parents are straight.  There is absolutely no evidence that having homosexual parents screws up a child’s development in any way.  Why do we continue denying permanent, loving homes to children who desperately need them?

2 Responses to “Thoughts on Gay Adoption”

  1. beetlebabee Says:

    I would disagree. It is very unfortunate that these children are in this situation, but it doesn’t change the proven fact that families with a mom and a dad are inherently more stable and that this stability passes on to the next generation.

    There are many problems in the foster care system, but gay parenting isn’t the answer.

  2. khazzard Says:

    “Families with a mom and dad are inherently more stable.”
    I haven’t seen any research to that effect, although if you have it I’m certainly open to reading it. I have seen that families with a mom and dad are more stable than single-parent homes, but that certainly doesn’t mean that we should ban single parenting!

    In any case, I can think of no arrangement that provides less stability than our current foster care system.

Leave a Reply